Bryant’s Roost Supplement Field Study
-
The Bryant’s Roost Supplement Field Study is designed to evaluate the impact of gut health supplementation on growth, vigor, fertility, hatchability, feather quality, overall health, and mortality in Jumbo Coturnix quail and Bresse chickens.
This ongoing study tracks developmental and reproductive outcomes under controlled conditions to determine whether targeted supplementation improves measurable breeder performance and chick viability.
-
Supplement intake will be measured per group and recorded over time. Growth rate, onset of lay, egg production, fertility, and hatchability will be tracked to evaluate the relationship between supplementation and breeder performance outcomes.
-
The supplement used in this trial was provided at no cost by the manufacturer.
To maintain objectivity and prevent external influence during the study period, the specific product is not being publicly identified at this time. The manufacturer has had no input on trial design, data collection, interpretation, or reporting.
All observations and data are recorded independently under standard breeder conditions at Bryant’s Roost.
Full product identification, formulation details, and sourcing information will be disclosed in the final published report upon completion of the study.
Fermex Field Study Update: First Bresse Offspring Weights
First individual weights from 30 Bresse chicks: offspring of Fermex-fed parents averaged 108.2 g versus 96.0 g for the other pens. An observational baseline, not proof of a supplement effect.
October 14, 2026 · Bryant’s Roost Supplement Field Study
We have a new starting point in our Fermex field study: the first individual weights from Bresse chicks produced by our breeding pens.
Today, we weighed and banded 30 chicks from four pens. The six chicks from Pen 5—the pen whose parent birds received Fermex in their feed beginning at hatch—had the highest average body weight at this first measurement.
That is an observation worth following, not proof that Fermex caused the difference.
Today’s Bresse chick weights
The chicks are approximately one week old. These measurements establish a baseline for following each bird over time.
| Breeding pen | Chicks | Mean weight |
|---|---|---|
| Pen 2 | 5 | 90.6 g |
| Pen 3 | 9 | 96.1 g |
| Pen 4 | 10 | 98.6 g |
| Pen 5 Fermex-fed parents | 6 | 108.2 g |
The 24 chicks from Pens 2, 3, and 4 averaged 96.0 grams combined. The six Pen 5 chicks averaged 108.2 grams—about 12.2 grams, or 12.7%, heavier at this first weighing. The combined comparison is calculated from all 24 individual weights, not a simple average of the three pen averages.
Heavier today does not yet mean faster growth
One weighing tells us what each chick weighs now. It does not tell us how quickly that chick gained weight. We need repeat measurements before we can compare growth rates.
Each chick now has an individual wing-band number, so future weigh-ins can follow the same birds rather than relying only on group averages.
What this comparison can—and cannot—tell us
This is an observational farm field study. Genetics, egg size, sex ratios, breeder performance, and other differences between pens may contribute to the weights we see.
There is only one Fermex-parent pen in this comparison. Its six chicks are six individual observations, not six independent treatment groups. That limits what we can conclude about the supplement.
We also need to keep parent supplementation separate from chick supplementation. The Pen 5 parents received Fermex as they grew and matured. Direct Fermex exposure of these offspring has not been established, so we are not presenting this as a trial of chicks being directly fed Fermex.
These weights do not establish a benefit in hatch rate, survival, or feed efficiency, and we are not attributing the weight difference to Fermex.
What we’ll follow next
Our next measurements will let us look at individual weight gain, how evenly the chicks grow, survival, and physical development. The important question is whether this early difference persists as the birds mature.
For now, we have a documented baseline and individually identified birds. We’ll keep reporting what we observe, including results that do not support a benefit. Promising observations are a reason to keep measuring—not a substitute for evidence.
Read the previous Fermex field study update or follow the full supplement field study.
Week 1 Observations
This study began after a manufacturer reached out and offered a gut health supplement for evaluation. The product was provided at no cost, with no input on trial design, data collection, or reporting. Given the opportunity to test it under real breeder conditions, I chose to run a structured field study focused on measurable outcomes.
The supplement used in this trial is a fermented, seaweed-based product processed using lactic acid bacteria. It is intended to support gut health, with the goal of improving overall bird condition, nutrient utilization, and resilience under typical production stressors.
In this study, I’m not evaluating claims directly, but observing whether measurable changes occur in growth consistency, vitality, feather quality, mortality, and long-term reproductive performance, including fertility and hatchability.
Short clip of chicks consuming the supplement during the first week.
Trial Setup
The supplement was delivered in a quantity sufficient to support approximately five months of use.
A breeder cage from Wynola Ranch was provided to conduct the adult portion of the trial.
On Wednesday, the first batch of quail hatched. Twenty chicks were placed in a brooder and provided clean water, the test supplement, and Show Pro Quail Starter feed. The brooder was set up with a brooder plate, dry stall pellets, and maintained in a draft-free environment.
As of this point, no mortalities have been observed. The chicks consumed the initial 3.9 g of supplement within the first 24 hours, indicating immediate acceptance.
On Saturday, April 4, a group of 7-week-old Coturnix quail—13 hens and 3 males—were moved into the Wynola Ranch breeder cage. Each bird was evaluated for physical defects, and none were identified. The group was weighed and found to be uniform in size.
These birds are being maintained on Show Pro layer/breeder feed and were provided 15.2 g of supplement upon introduction. One bird began consuming the supplement immediately, with others following shortly after.
Additional breeder groups have been sorted and will be incorporated into the trial as it progresses.
Early Observations
From a breeder standpoint, the first thing I notice with any new supplement is whether birds accept it without hesitation. In this case, both chicks and adults showed immediate interest. There was no delay in consumption, which is often the first barrier with any new input.
The supplement itself has a mild, pleasant odor and a crumble consistency that works well across age groups. The particle size is appropriate for both chicks and adult birds, which makes it easy to offer without modification.
At five days old, the chicks appear uniform in size and remain active. There are no early signs of lagging individuals, which is one of the first indicators I watch for when evaluating overall development.
The Bresse group presents a different challenge. Because they are maintained outdoors, accurately measuring supplement intake is more difficult due to environmental factors such as rodents and general feed loss. For now, I’ve incorporated the supplement into their daily feed ration while I work toward a more controlled method of tracking consumption.
At this stage, the most important indicators are acceptance, activity, and uniformity. All three are present so far, which provides a solid baseline moving into the next phase of observation.
What I’m Watching Next
Moving into next week, I’ll be adding a control group of 20 chicks from this week’s hatch to establish a direct comparison against the supplemented group.
I’ll also be finishing setup of the breeder groups and continuing to track supplement intake as consistently as possible.
Another area I’ll be paying closer attention to is manure condition on the poop trays compared to non-supplemented groups, as this can provide an early indicator of digestive response.

